Mastermind killed in police raids, the driver still on the run, the 'cowgirl' who was not devout enough and the man who blew himself up: What happened to the 'devil' and his evil disciples?
The 'Mastermind' of the Paris attacks |
This is a lead up story following the Paris attacks last week found in the Daily Mail and written Paul Cahalan In Brussels and Hannah Flint For The Mail On Sunday.
I was intrigued by this headline because of the semantic field of religion with use of words such as the devil and disciples. I thought that this was peculiar as it now makes religion a prominent theme or thought throughout the text and because all of the suspected follow their interpretation of Islam, it creates a certain prejudice around others of that faith as they are now linked with these Christianity words of hatred-even though terrorism has no religion.
The article goes on to list all of the participants of the attack with their picture and how they were caught/how they died, and also some backstories into how they became the way they were. One section I found interesting was a line about the 'Mastermind' Abdekhamid Abaaoud about when he went to his private school in Paris.
'But this weekend, classmates revealed he was a bully who once stole a Nintendo Game Boy from the school’s lost-and-found and taunted other pupils.'
This implies to the audience that Abaaoud was born evil and almost suggests his path was inevitable because he was mean as a child and 'no one stopped him'. I think this additional information adds very little to the article as, the audience already know what a horrible human being this man was, so I personally don't see why we need the justification of knowing he was naughty as a child. I understand it takes a certain type of person to be brainwashed into the ideals these men, and woman, were but something as trivial as stealing a Nintendo seems irrelevant.
Your story is really interesting & you have given a lot of detail into why you think this story is so important. The way you have analysed it is also interesting which made me want to read it. To improve, you could possibly talk about why you think this is beginning to be about religion and what effects this may have?
ReplyDeleteWell done!
I think you have written a good amount of detailed response to the content of the article.
ReplyDeleteI also like the way you have included what caught your attention to respond to the article.
Though you have included good opinions in your response, could you expand on these and write more about what you think of the articles and the events themselves?