Monday, 23 January 2017

Weekly News 50



'WE RISKED IT ALL FOR A FLING' 

As racy BBC thriller Apple Tree Yard hits screens, we speak to four real women with different reasons for having an affair… from loneliness to revenge


This story comes from The Sun and is written by Nikki Watkins.
The story is a real-life follow up to the new BBC series Apple Tree Yard, based on the novel by Louise Doughty, which follows a married woman having an affair with a married man. 
I was intrigued by this article, as it seemed to suggest that cheating and having an affair is an acceptable, or justifiable thing to do in modern society, this is evidenced further by it's common reoccurrence across television and film and in literature, such as Apple Tree Yard, which represents the issue as common and relatable, which is worrying. It is estimated that roughly 42% of marriages in England and Wales end in divorce, and the article gives specific examples of that.
Image result for apple tree yard bbc

Watkins follows 4 women who all claim to have had affairs for different reasons, specifically;
- I cheated... to appreciate what I had
- I cheated... because I was so lonely
-I cheated... because I fell in love
-I cheated... to get revenge 
With only one of the women still remaining with her original partner, the openness and exposure these women are getting, almost glorifying having an affair, brings into question the stability of modern relationships/marriages. Sites such as Maritalaffair.co.uk and meet2cheat.co.uk are also normalising the situation, and charging people to do so.
This article irritated me really, especially following the recent Women's Marches against Trump's inauguration to promote equality for women as well as people from the LGBTQ community, who are slammed by Evangelicals and other 'traditional' groups for damaging the sanctity of marriage. 
Although the issue of cheating is definitely not confined to women, I think this article provides a negative representation not only of married women, but marriages in general, suggesting that such a traditional institution is just as easily corruptible as other aspects of 21st century life. 

Friday, 20 January 2017

How effectively were your 3 main texts marketed?

The marketing of a text can be as crucial to it's success as the shows actual content. The mediums it chose to advertise and market the text will have effect on the audiences the show reaches, and will further be evidence for how effectively the text was marketed. The merchandise of the programme also provides extra revenue for the production company, this could be in the form of baking essentials with programmes such as Great British Bake Off (Love Productions, 2010-2016), or board games through I'm a Celebrity (ITV Studios, 2002-2016). 

As aforementioned, one text that has maximised it's possible revenue through merchandising and marketing is Great British Bake Off on the BBC, although transitioning to Channel 4 in 2017. As the Great British Bake Off has quickly become a well established or 'flagship programme' for the BBC, in terms of advertising or marketing in television adverts, there is low production costs needed as the recognisable genres and aspects of the show, such as the tent or the presenters, are needed to tease the anticipating, loyal audiences. As the basis for the programme is a simple, and easily replicated format of baking, the extent of merchandise and platforms for advertising are much broader than more specified shows such as I'm a Celebrity. The products available under the Bake Off umbrella include recipe books, baking utensils such as spatulas and bowls, even down to paper masks of the shows well loved matriarch of baking, Mary Berry. The social media platforms of Facebook and Twitter with constant updates being posted about the programmes, with an extremely active Facebook page and over 557k followers on Twitter. This is evidence of an effectively marketed main text, as the success of reaching out to younger audiences through social media, has allowed the unlikely baking competition to reach unprecedented viewer ratings, such as the recent 2016 final where the viewing peaked at 14.8 million, compared to a programme such as X Factor (FreeMantle Productions 2004-2016) which reached only 7 million in it's final.

A programme which despite not having an advantage in terms of merchandise would be Gogglebox (Studio Lambert 2013-2016). Gogglebox, like GBBO, began with an unlikely preset for a successful programme and also has a wide social media following with 237k followers on Twitter, with parody accounts such as '@GoggleBoxQuotes' having an impressive 85.5k followers. Gogglebox's most notable method of merchandising could be the constant outsourcing of it's participants such as Steph and Dom or most recently Scarlett Moffat. The appearances of these television on other programmes such as Alan Carr's Chatty Man (Series 17, Episode 1) and Four in a Bed.

40 Minutes ended here********

I'm a Celeb uses board games, more use of the app and awards, Ant and Dec's 14 time winning of NTA award??

Monday, 16 January 2017

Explore the Mechanics of the Modern Music Industry (1104 words)



The modern music industry is an unprecedented phenomenon that influences the way we feel, the things we buy and ultimately aids in shaping modern culture and society. What makes the modern music industry so unique to the music distributed throughout history, is the way we as an audience receive our music, it could further be argued that music has transformed from an outlet of entertainment to a product of advertisement. The industry itself is worth approximately $42 billion, taking just $15 billion in the US alone. The three main recording companies in the industry are Sony, Warner Bros and Universal. Some aspects of the industry, however, can be controversial, and with no real experience in dealing with this second digital revolution, exploitation can be common and costly to artists.

Three specific artists which belong to the aforementioned, or branches of the aforementioned, record labels include Adele, who in 2016 signed a £90 million contract with Sony, Amy Winehouse who was signed with Island records, a branch of Universal records, and Jessie J who is also signed with Island records. These British artists are a useful reference point when exploring the music industry, as they all have unique experiences and consequences from entering and thriving in music.

As previously noted, the music industry is undergoing what is being referred to as a second ‘Digital revolution’ whereby the way in which consumers listen and buy music has progressed into unchartered means. The growth of music streaming companies such as Spotify, Amazon Prime Music, Apple Music, mean that record companies have unlocked a reliable stream of revenue from customers through the use of monthly or annual subscription. As the apps or services often offer a free trial or alternative, companies can also maximise profits through advertising. Not only does it provide broader access for more listeners, but it allows consumers the capability to explore new or alternative artists to those in the mainstream media or always played on the radio. This service is beneficial to artists such as Adele who are already globally renowned, as it makes the distribution of her records far easier. Amy Winehouse however did not have this advantage during her recording career and therefore the sale of her physical albums was crucial whilst also being unreliable, meaning her career could not be so certain.

Certain labels tend to affiliate themselves with a particular genre of artist, to optimise the selling of that particular artist and also offers more chance of collaborations between artists, which means more control and revenue for the company. Record labels look for a particular style of artist of what they think will sell, or alternatively/ more commonly, labels find talented hopefuls and mould them into what they can make the most profit out of. A perfect example for this would Amy Winehouse, whose label, Island Records, is a Jamaican-American label who signs more alternative, edgy acts such as Annie Lennox, Dizzie Rascal and DNCE. Amy was pushed by her managerial team and exploited for talent, despite being very vulnerable with a drug addiction. Amy’s blue eyed soul style of music made her a refreshing and new artist at the time, providing lots of outlets for promotion such as chat shows like The Graham Norton Show, or The Tonight Show in America with Jay Leno and a complete reinvention of image. Ultimately the neglect and exploitation of the singer songwriter led to her demise and death in July 2011, demonstrating the very extremes of the power and control a record label has over their artists in their pursuit for success.

Image result for amy winehouse

A parallel to Amy would be Adele, who shares a similar genre of music, but who was initially signed by XL records, recording label of Radiohead, The White Stripes and M.I.A. Adele has remained grounded and successful throughout her career, and has changed minimally in appearance, persona and music style throughout her 11-year career. Adele is also a clear example of how marketing has become so affluent with the music industry, with the increase in streaming music online, to stay relevant an artist has to remain in the public eye, often meaning being present on social media such as Twitter and Instagram or appearing on chat shows such as The Late Late Show with James Corden or the Jonathan Ross Show. The has enabled the maintenance of record sales for artists such as Adele, as consumers are constantly being refreshed about their upcoming projects or tours, which leads to the further listening to their music. Adele is a positive success story of the music industry, by taking significant breaks from recording after each album, she has demonstrated how to maintain a successful career, whilst also juggling a normal home life with her fiancé and son.

Adele smiling

Each recording artist has undertaken a unique journey into the music industry, as the platform is so diverse and ever-changing, no two stories can be the same. Jessie J after not finding a contract initially, was actually a songwriter with Sony records writing for popular American artists such as Chris Brown and Miley Cyrus. This is also evidence of staging of the music industry, as these popular artists are represented as merely puppets for profit by the record companies, by given songs to sing by paid professionals. Jessie J was discovered after he wrote ‘Do it like a Dude’ for Rhianna, after sending it to Island Records and Rhianna’s management, the company insisted that it become her debut single and was subsequently released in 2010. This is evidence of record companies spotting profitable talent, and as Jessie was a new artist she would not have been expensive to promote as she had not established a fandom yet. The cross record label aspect of Jessie J is notable as it highlights that despite rivalries and the willingness for one’s own company to succeed, a label will not discriminate against artists if there is profit to be made, i.e. hiring Jessie as a songwriter, to harness her talent whilst promoting other artists.


Do It like a Dude cover.png

To conclude, the Modern music industry is very complex, and grows more unchartered every day. With the coming of the second digital revolution, artists now have access to multitude of different audiences in a swift and non-labour enduring manner. There is evidence of both the positive and negative sides to the control, and freedom offered by record labels and streaming companies, and both need to be taking into account when reviewing the success of the industry. Despite predictions being made about the future of the distribution of music, as demonstrated countless times before, the industry is fluid and also mutating into something unprecedented and exciting.


Sunday, 15 January 2017

Weekly News 39

DIN-DINS DING DONG 

Axed Come Dine With Me contestant was ‘boozed up, abused contestants and threatened TV crew’t


Article from the Sun written by BY FINDLAY MAIR AND DARREN HAMILTON

I chose this story as it followed with one feature of our case studies, British Reality Tv, and the show. Interestingly, the programme is produced by a company called Shiver which is part of ITV studios, however, Come Dine With Me is a very popular Channel 4 programme.

This story caught my attention as I had previously seen the controversy on Twitter when the episode was aired, asking questions about the first ever contestant to be axed from the show mid-week. The story follows the accounts of the winner of said episode, and why Rory Nicoll, 41, was booted from the show.

Reportedly, Nicoll was asked to leave due reports of him heavily drinking and being abusive towards the production team and the other contestants, with one accusation including Nicoll pinning up one fo the producers against the wall and shouting at him.

Scot Nicoll branded an a******e by fellow contestant

This story would be useful as a supplementary to our main case studies n terms of industry but also would be a good case study for representation of national and regional identity, as the episode was from the Central Scotland edition of the show.

Monday, 9 January 2017

Weekly News 38



'IT’S RACIST AGAINST TRAVELLERS'

Two traveller women shamed online for shopping in Tesco in their pyjamas brand their male critic ‘sexist’ and ‘racist’

One of the women said it was an attack on their traveller 'way of life'

This story comes from The Sun and is written by Annabel Howard

This is the argument between a man named Chris Cooke, who posted an image of two women shopping in Tesco, complaining that they were shopping in their pyjamas, and calling for Tesco to ban people from being served if they are not appropriately dressed. 

The two women pictured, who have asked not be named, have responded to the photo. They claim to have changed into their pyjamas ready for a night in, however then realised they needed to get milk for younger of the women's baby. The women are travellers and claim the post is 'an attack on their way of life', whilst also labelling it as 'sexist  and racist'. 

I personally think that if these women feel comfortable enough to travel out dressed like this, then it is their choice. There are no major differences between pyjamas and everyday clothes, despite their labels and uses, and I find it odd how Mr Cooke finds it so detrimental to his shopping experience that others are dressed this way. 

To call the remarks an attack on travellers however is contradictory to the women's point. They claim that they just 'popped out' to get the child milk suggesting that wearing their nightwear out was a last minute but convenient decision, but by accusing Cooke are directing their culture suggests that going out dressed like this is common occurrence, which makes their plea for sympathy surrounding the child redundant.

Nevertheless, to post the photo condemning the women without their permission, for essentially not dressing to Mr Cooke standards of social etiquette, is unjustified and unless the clothing was offensive, or has any impact on other peoples shopping, people should be allowed to dress however they deem appropriate for the situation.